Choosing the Right Platform for College Credit
Colleges use many systems to manage credit pathways but those systems aren’t always designed to work together.
Built Around How Campus Work Actually Happens
Admissions, dual enrollment, articulation, credit review, and student mobility aren’t linear processes. They involve shared responsibility across offices, pauses and restarts, document verification, and accountability that spans roles and departments.
Campus Credit was built by practitioners who understand that reality.
Our workflows reflect real campus operations — with clear ownership, structured steps, and audit-ready records at every stage — so institutions can scale programs without adding complexity or another system.
Most Platforms Solve
One Problem Well
Most higher-ed platforms are built to do one thing well — dual enrollment, study abroad, transcripts, or applications.
The problem shows up when campuses grow.
Each new program brings a new system, a new contract, and another data silo. Staff end up reconciling records, repeating reviews, and explaining inconsistencies to students.
Campus Credit was built differently.
It’s a shared system designed to support multiple credit pathways on the same underlying structure — so programs can expand without adding complexity or more tools.
“I love going into an office and leaving confused because every office told me something different.”
— No student, ever
How Campus Credit Compares
Below is a high-level comparison between Campus Credit and commonly used platforms, including DualEnrollment.com, Terra Dotta, and Parchment.
Each platform serves an important role. The difference is how they are designed—and how well they support institutions managing more than one credit pathway across offices.
Campus Credit vs. Competitors
This comparison reflects primary use cases and typical deployments based on publicly available information and customer experience. Capabilities may vary by configuration, implementation, or institutional context.